Mosiah 15 | |
Trinitarian 11 This seems very Trinitarian. Some defend some seemingly Trinitarian Book of Mormon references as not contradicting current Mormon godhead doctrine (see The Doctrine of God the Father in the Book of Mormon), but in context of doctrine taught in the “Lectures on Faith” how sound is this defense? From the “Lectures on Faith” that used to be in the Doctrine and Covenants until the 1921 edition: “The Father being a personage of spirit, glory, and power, possessing all perfection and fulness. The Son, who was in the bosom of the Father, is a personage of tabernacle . . . He is called the Son because of the flesh . . . He, possessing the same mind with the Father, which mind is the Holy Spirit that bears record of the Father and the Son.” “Questions and Answers for Lecture 5? 3. Q—How many personages are there in the Godhead? A—Two: the Father and Son (Lecture 5: 1). 13. Q—Do the Father and the Son possess the same mind? A—They do . . . 14. Q—What is this mind? A—The Holy Spirit” (Lecture 5). | |
2 1 Mosiah 15:1-5
This seems very Trinitarian.
Some defend some seemingly Trinitarian Book of Mormon references as not contradicting current Mormon godhead doctrine (see [The Doctrine of God the Father in the Book of Mormon](https://rsc.byu.edu/archived/book-mormon-treasury/doctrine-god-father-book-mormon)), but in context of doctrine taught in the “Lectures on Faith” how sound is this defense?
From the “Lectures on Faith” that used to be in the Doctrine and Covenants until the 1921 edition:
“The Father being a personage of spirit, glory, and power, possessing all perfection and fulness. The Son, who was in the bosom of the Father, is a personage of tabernacle . . . He is called the Son because of the flesh . . . He, possessing the same mind with the Father, which mind is the Holy Spirit that bears record of the Father and the Son.”
“Questions and Answers for Lecture 5?
3. Q—How many personages are there in the Godhead?
A—Two: the Father and Son (Lecture 5: 1).
13. Q—Do the Father and the Son possess the same mind?
A—They do . . .
14. Q—What is this mind?
A—The Holy Spirit”
([Lecture 5](https://rsc.byu.edu/archived/lectures-faith-historical-perspective/lectures-faith-1990-edited-version/lecture-5)). | |
3 1 Mosiah 15:1-5
This seems very Trinitarian.
Some defend some seemingly Trinitarian Book of Mormon references as not contradicting current Mormon godhead doctrine (see [The Doctrine of God the Father in the Book of Mormon](https://rsc.byu.edu/archived/book-mormon-treasury/doctrine-god-father-book-mormon)), but in context of doctrine taught in the “Lectures on Faith” how sound is this defense?
From the “Lectures on Faith” that used to be in the Doctrine and Covenants until the 1921 edition:
“The Father being a personage of spirit, glory, and power, possessing all perfection and fulness. The Son, who was in the bosom of the Father, is a personage of tabernacle . . . He is called the Son because of the flesh . . . He, possessing the same mind with the Father, which mind is the Holy Spirit that bears record of the Father and the Son.”
“Questions and Answers for Lecture 5?
3. Q—How many personages are there in the Godhead?
A—Two: the Father and Son (Lecture 5: 1).
13. Q—Do the Father and the Son possess the same mind?
A—They do . . .
14. Q—What is this mind?
A—The Holy Spirit”
([Lecture 5](https://rsc.byu.edu/archived/lectures-faith-historical-perspective/lectures-faith-1990-edited-version/lecture-5)). | |
4 1 Mosiah 15:1-5
This seems very Trinitarian.
Some defend some seemingly Trinitarian Book of Mormon references as not contradicting current Mormon godhead doctrine (see [The Doctrine of God the Father in the Book of Mormon](https://rsc.byu.edu/archived/book-mormon-treasury/doctrine-god-father-book-mormon)), but in context of doctrine taught in the “Lectures on Faith” how sound is this defense?
From the “Lectures on Faith” that used to be in the Doctrine and Covenants until the 1921 edition:
“The Father being a personage of spirit, glory, and power, possessing all perfection and fulness. The Son, who was in the bosom of the Father, is a personage of tabernacle . . . He is called the Son because of the flesh . . . He, possessing the same mind with the Father, which mind is the Holy Spirit that bears record of the Father and the Son.”
“Questions and Answers for Lecture 5?
3. Q—How many personages are there in the Godhead?
A—Two: the Father and Son (Lecture 5: 1).
13. Q—Do the Father and the Son possess the same mind?
A—They do . . .
14. Q—What is this mind?
A—The Holy Spirit”
([Lecture 5](https://rsc.byu.edu/archived/lectures-faith-historical-perspective/lectures-faith-1990-edited-version/lecture-5)). | |
5 1 Mosiah 15:1-5
This seems very Trinitarian.
Some defend some seemingly Trinitarian Book of Mormon references as not contradicting current Mormon godhead doctrine (see [The Doctrine of God the Father in the Book of Mormon](https://rsc.byu.edu/archived/book-mormon-treasury/doctrine-god-father-book-mormon)), but in context of doctrine taught in the “Lectures on Faith” how sound is this defense?
From the “Lectures on Faith” that used to be in the Doctrine and Covenants until the 1921 edition:
“The Father being a personage of spirit, glory, and power, possessing all perfection and fulness. The Son, who was in the bosom of the Father, is a personage of tabernacle . . . He is called the Son because of the flesh . . . He, possessing the same mind with the Father, which mind is the Holy Spirit that bears record of the Father and the Son.”
“Questions and Answers for Lecture 5?
3. Q—How many personages are there in the Godhead?
A—Two: the Father and Son (Lecture 5: 1).
13. Q—Do the Father and the Son possess the same mind?
A—They do . . .
14. Q—What is this mind?
A—The Holy Spirit”
([Lecture 5](https://rsc.byu.edu/archived/lectures-faith-historical-perspective/lectures-faith-1990-edited-version/lecture-5)). | |
6 | |
7 | |
8 | |
9 Having ascended into heaven, having the bowels of mercy; being filled with compassion towards the children of men; standing betwixt them and justice; having broken the bands of death, taken upon himself their iniquity and their transgressions, having redeemed them, and satisfied the demands of justice. | 9 1 Compare this verse with "bowels of mercy" and Colossians 3:12 with "bowels of mercies". Notice how there are only 4 KJV bible verses that contain a variation of "bowels" and "mercy". Nothing is as close a match as the verse in Colossians 3. It's strange how Abinadi was so ahead of his time. |
10 | |
11 Behold I say unto you, that whosoever has heard the words of the prophets, yea, all the holy prophets who have prophesied concerning the coming of the Lord--I say unto you, that all those who have hearkened unto their words, and believed that the Lord would redeem his people, and have looked forward to that day for a remission of their sins, I say unto you, that these are his seed, or they are the heirs of the kingdom of God. | 11 |
12 | |
13 | |
14 | |
15 | |
16 | |
17 | |
18 | |
19 | |
20 | |
21 | |
22 | |
23 | |
24 And these are those who have part in the first resurrection; and these are they that have died before Christ came, in their ignorance, not having salvation declared unto them. And thus the Lord bringeth about the restoration of these; and they have a part in the first resurrection, or have eternal life, being redeemed by the Lord. | 24 3 But, the LDS Church does ordinances for the dead, even though according to this those who die in ignorance have eternal life, and according to Moroni 8:22-23, those who have not the law need not baptism. |
25 | |
26 But behold, and fear, and tremble before God, for ye ought to tremble; for the Lord redeemeth none such that rebel against him and die in their sins; yea, even all those that have perished in their sins ever since the world began, that have wilfully rebelled against God, that have known the commandments of God, and would not keep them; these are they that have no part in the first resurrection. | 26 |
27 1 Both this verse and 2 Timothy 2:13 contain the phrase "he cannot deny himself", which is unique within the KJV bible. Note that are only 2 instances of the shortened phrase "cannot deny", both being in the New Testament. | |
28 | |
Anachronism 291 This is a quote of Isaiah 52:8-10. There seems to be a consensus among serious biblical scholars that this passage from Isaiah was written during the Babylonian exile, in other words, it appears to have been written after Lehi left Jerusalem. “Modern scholarship considers the Book of Isaiah to be an anthology, the two principal compositions of which are the Book of Isaiah proper (chapters 1-39, with some exceptions), containing the words of the prophet Isaiah himself, dating from the time of the First Temple, around 700 BCE, and Second Isaiah (Deutero-Isaiah, chapters 40-66), comprising the words of an anonymous prophet, who lived some one hundred and fifty years later, around the time of the Babylonian exile” (RationalWiki: Book of Isaiah). It is also interesting to note that these verses were quoted just three chapters earlier in Mosiah 12:22-24. | |
30 1 Mosiah 15:29-31
This is a quote of Isaiah 52:8-10. There seems to be a consensus among serious biblical scholars that this passage from Isaiah was written during the Babylonian exile, in other words, it appears to have been written after Lehi left Jerusalem.
“Modern scholarship considers the Book of Isaiah to be an anthology, the two principal compositions of which are the Book of Isaiah proper (chapters 1-39, with some exceptions), containing the words of the prophet Isaiah himself, dating from the time of the First Temple, around 700 BCE, and Second Isaiah (Deutero-Isaiah, chapters 40-66), comprising the words of an anonymous prophet, who lived some one hundred and fifty years later, around the time of the Babylonian exile”
([RationalWiki: Book of Isaiah](https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Book%5Fof%5FIsaiah)).
It is also interesting to note that these verses were quoted just three chapters earlier in Mosiah 12:22-24. | |
31 1 Mosiah 15:29-31
This is a quote of Isaiah 52:8-10. There seems to be a consensus among serious biblical scholars that this passage from Isaiah was written during the Babylonian exile, in other words, it appears to have been written after Lehi left Jerusalem.
“Modern scholarship considers the Book of Isaiah to be an anthology, the two principal compositions of which are the Book of Isaiah proper (chapters 1-39, with some exceptions), containing the words of the prophet Isaiah himself, dating from the time of the First Temple, around 700 BCE, and Second Isaiah (Deutero-Isaiah, chapters 40-66), comprising the words of an anonymous prophet, who lived some one hundred and fifty years later, around the time of the Babylonian exile”
([RationalWiki: Book of Isaiah](https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Book%5Fof%5FIsaiah)).
It is also interesting to note that these verses were quoted just three chapters earlier in Mosiah 12:22-24. |